Human conclusions stay human
Each task records Compliant, Non-Compliant, In Progress or Not Applicable. Legiscope does not autonomously decide it.
Audits and evidence
Make the review trail as useful as the conclusion.
Legiscope combines structured human audits with source documents that remain attached to the records and checks they support.
- Audit
- Fixed checklist snapshot
- Conclusions
- Four explicit states
- Evidence
- Original remains authoritative
What changes
Separate what was reviewed from what is compliant.
Completion is not compliance
Reviewed work and compliant work remain separate measures, so an answered checklist cannot imply a clean result.
The source remains authoritative
AI-derived information stays visibly generated and never replaces the original uploaded document.
Inside the workflow
A human checklist with its source material.
These are the supported boundaries of this workflow. Permissions and organisation scope continue to govern access.
- 01
Create one live structured audit for a processing activity.
- 02
Use a fixed Simplified, Standard or Extended checklist in English or French.
- 03
Record explicit task conclusions and find unresolved work.
- 04
Attach task-specific evidence without changing the conclusion automatically.
- 05
Track evidence processing state, provenance and the original download.
An audit documents review; it does not certify compliance.
Evidence is not treated as sufficient proof merely because it was uploaded. Legiscope does not claim autonomous conclusions, weighted legal-risk scoring, automatic remediation or certification.
How Legiscope uses AI